- Press Reset and check that u=(1,2) and v=(2,−1).按「重設」,確認 u=(1,2)、v=(2,−1)。
- Move a from 1 to −1 and keep b at 1. Predict the direction of au first.把 a 從 1 移到 −1,b 保持 1。先猜 au 的方向。
- Compare the diagram with the coordinate equations: each coordinate is multiplied by a, then added to bv.比較圖與座標算式:每個座標都要乘上 a,再與 bv 相加。
Predict → change one value → inspect the calculation → read the key idea.先預測 → 改一個值 → 檢查算式 → 看懂重點概念。
A vector can be scaled, added, and combined.向量可以伸縮、相加,也可以組合。
Start in ℝ² with real scalars. Predict the result, then change one coordinate or scalar. Negative scalars reverse direction; a zero scalar gives the zero vector.先在 ℝ² 中使用實數純量(scalar)。先預測結果,再改變一個座標或純量。負的純量會使方向相反;純量為 0 時得到零向量(zero vector)。
Integers, decimals and fractions such as 1/2 are accepted. Coordinates: −5 to 5.可輸入整數、小數或分數(例如 1/2)。座標範圍:−5 到 5。
The dashed sides complete the parallelogram. Coincident arrows can overlap; the labeled coordinates still distinguish them. The axes rescale to keep the vectors visible.虛線補成一個平行四邊形。重合的箭頭可能互相蓋住,但標示的座標仍能區分它們。座標軸會自動縮放,讓向量保持可見。
Why is the result still in ℝ²?為什麼結果仍在 ℝ² 裡?
au+bv=(au₁+bv₁, au₂+bv₂) ∈ ℝ².
Every coordinate is real because real numbers are closed under addition and multiplication. This argument works for every u, v, a and b; the picture shows only particular choices.因為實數對加法和乘法封閉,每個座標都還是實數。這個論證對所有 u、v、a、b 都成立;圖形只呈現某些特定的選擇。
打中目標Hit the target
調整 a 和 b,讓紅色的 au+bv 剛好落在紫色的 ◎ 上。可以拉滑桿,也可以在圖上拖動藍色、綠色箭頭的尖端:au 只能沿著 u 的方向伸縮,bv 只能沿著 v 的方向伸縮。a、b 可以是 0.5 的倍數。Adjust a and b so that the red au+bv lands exactly on the purple ◎. Use the sliders, or drag the tips of the blue and green arrows on the grid: au can only stretch along u, and bv only along v. a and b can be multiples of 0.5.
Does the operation keep you inside the set?運算後還留在集合裡嗎?
Every set below uses the usual operations inherited from ℝ² and real scalars. A failed closure test must start with vectors actually in the set.下面每個集合都沿用 ℝ² 的一般運算,純量為實數。要說封閉性(closure)不成立,起始向量必須真的在集合裡。
Coordinates and scalar: −5 to 5; fractions allowed.座標與純量範圍:−5 到 5;可輸入分數。
Reveal the conclusion and its justification顯示結論與理由
0 ∈ S; u,v ∈ S ⇒ u+v ∈ S;
a ∈ ℝ, u ∈ S ⇒ au ∈ S.
These conditions suffice here because the other axioms are inherited from ℝ². For newly defined operations, closure alone is not enough.這裡檢查這三個條件就夠了,因為其他公理(axiom)都從 ℝ² 繼承而來。如果運算是新定義的,只有封閉性並不夠。
A vector space is a set with rules.向量空間是一個帶有規則的集合。
Specify a nonempty set V, a scalar field F, addition V × V → V, and scalar multiplication F × V → V. Here F is usually ℝ; ℂ is another possible field.要指定一個非空集合 V、一個純量體(scalar field)F、加法 V × V → V,以及純量乘法 F × V → V。這裡 F 通常是 ℝ;ℂ 也是一種可能的體。
Consequences: zero scaling and negatives推論:乘以 0 與負向量
(−1)v+v = (−1+1)v = 0v = 0 ⇒ (−1)v = −v.
In the first implication, add the additive inverse of 0v to both sides. The scalar 0 and the vector 0 play different roles.第一個推論中,兩邊同時加上 0v 的加法反元素(additive inverse)。純量 0 和零向量 0 扮演不同的角色。
| Object物件 | constant常數項 | t | t² |
|---|---|---|---|
| p / f | |||
| q / g |
More examples from the notes講義中的更多例子
ℝⁿ: (u+v)ⱼ = uⱼ+vⱼ, (au)ⱼ = auⱼ.
P(ℝ): all real polynomials, with ordinary addition and real scalar multiplication.所有實係數多項式,使用一般的加法與實數純量乘法。
C([r,s],ℝ): continuous functions, with連續函數,運算為 (f+g)(t)=f(t)+g(t), (af)(t)=af(t).
Sums and scalar multiples of continuous functions remain continuous. The zero vector is the function t ↦ 0. In P(ℝ), multiplying by the variable t is not scalar multiplication over ℝ.連續函數的和與純量倍仍是連續函數。零向量是函數 t ↦ 0。在 P(ℝ) 中,乘上變數 t 並不是 ℝ 上的純量乘法。
Closure alone can mislead.只看封閉性可能被誤導。
On ℝ², invent u ⊕ v = u+v+(1,0), but keep ordinary scalar multiplication. Both operations stay in ℝ².在 ℝ² 上自訂加法 u ⊕ v = u+v+(1,0),純量乘法維持一般的方式。兩種運算的結果都還在 ℝ² 裡。
Try distributivity with a=0 and u=v=(0,0):用 a=0、u=v=(0,0) 檢查分配律:
(0u) ⊕ (0v) = (0,0)+(0,0)+(1,0) = (1,0).
Since the two results differ, these operations do not define a vector space.兩個結果不同,所以這組運算不能構成向量空間。
Is the additive identity necessarily (0,0)?加法單位元素一定是 (0,0) 嗎?
For this invented addition, the identity would be (−1,0), because v ⊕ (−1,0)=v. The failed distributive law still rules out a vector space with the chosen scaling.對這個自訂加法來說,單位元素會是 (−1,0),因為 v ⊕ (−1,0)=v。但在這種純量乘法下分配律失敗,所以仍然不是向量空間。
公理偵探:哪一條規則壞了?Axiom detective: which rule breaks?
上面的例子是別人找到的反例,現在換你來找。下面每一種運算都把結果留在 ℝ² 裡(封閉性成立),但至少有一條公理會失敗。改變 u、v、w、a、b,看哪一列出現「≠」,然後勾選所有會失敗的公理。小心:某些公理只在特定數值下才露出破綻。Above, someone else found the counterexample; now it is your turn. Each operation below keeps results in ℝ² (closure holds), but at least one axiom fails. Change u, v, w, a and b, watch for a row showing “≠”, then tick every axiom that fails. Careful: some axioms only break for particular values.
Try it. Check it. Learn the key idea.動手做、核對答案、看懂重點。
Allow 25–30 minutes for exploration and practice. Start with your own calculation; feedback identifies the relevant definition and gives an equation or counterexample. Retrying is encouraged.預留 25–30 分鐘探索與練習。先自己計算;回饋會指出相關的定義,並給出算式或反例。鼓勵你多試幾次。
Show that S = {(x,y): xy=0} is not closed under addition.說明 S = {(x,y): xy=0} 對加法不封閉:找兩個集合內的向量,使它們的和跑到集合外。
Enter two members u,v whose sum lies outside S. Many answers are possible.輸入 S 中的兩個向量 u、v,使 u+v 不在 S 裡。答案不只一種。